Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Grand Rapids-Greenway | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 0.500 | 0.0755 | 0.0755 |
| 2020-21 | Grand Rapids-Greenway | USHS-MN-W | 21 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 0.905 | 0.1366 | 0.1366 |
| 2021-22 | Grand Rapids-Greenway | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 17 | 28 | 45 | 1.667 | 0.2517 | 0.2517 |
| 2022-23 | Grand Rapids-Greenway | USHS-MN-W | 28 | 13 | 37 | 50 | 1.786 | 0.2696 | 0.2447 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC | FR | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.500 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sophia Kunin | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.62 PPG | 0.425 | Wisconsin |
| Taylor Williamson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.64 PPG | 0.395 | Minnesota |
| Emily Gunderson | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.64 PPG | 0.171 | Lindenwood |
| Brooke Madsen | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.60 PPG | 0.600 | Penn State |
| Lydia Passolt | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.60 PPG | 0.095 | Bemidji State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samantha Bogen | 2023-24 · 1.48 PPG | 0.400 | St. Catherine | MIAC |
| Ruby Eskin | 2023-24 · 1.08 PPG | 0.552 | Augsburg | MIAC |
| Emily Heid | 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG | 0.593 | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC |
| Addie Fee | 2024-25 · 1.27 PPG | 0.480 | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC |
| Abigail Chamernick | 2022-23 · 1.17 PPG | 0.500 | Hamline | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.