← Women's Rankings ↗ Social Card

Meghan Turner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-08-07 Country: USA

NCAA-W Projection

Projecting as:

Target Conference:

Show:

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W

0.44

Average (0.25–0.45)

Base NCAAe-W PPG0.4641

Conf. Strength0.994

Year Adj (FR)×0.80

Confidencehigh

Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W / D2W

Projected PPG — Division Avg

0.79

Strong (0.65–1.00)

Base D3e-W PPG0.8341

Conf. Strength1.000

Year Adj (FR)×0.80

Confidencelow

Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-W PPG	Age-Adjusted
2012-13	Phillips Exeter Academy	USHS-W	23	22	28	50	2.174	0.6328	0.5601
2018-19	Worcester Blades	CWHL	21	0	2	2	0.095	N/A	N/A
2019-20	Worcester Blades	CWHL	21	0	2	2	0.095	N/A	N/A
2020-21	Worcester Blades	CWHL	21	0	2	2	0.095	N/A	N/A
2021-22	Worcester Blades	CWHL	21	0	2	2	0.095	N/A	N/A
2022-23	Worcester Blades	CWHL	21	0	2	2	0.095	N/A	N/A
2023-24	Worcester Blades	CWHL	21	0	2	2	0.095	N/A	N/A
2025-26	Worcester Blades	CWHL	21	0	2	2	0.095	N/A	N/A

NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent · COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

Season	School	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2016-17	Quinnipiac	ECAC-W	SR	37	12	10	22	0.595
2015-16	Quinnipiac	ECAC-W	JR	37	8	4	12	0.324
2014-15	Quinnipiac	ECAC-W	SO	38	4	1	5	0.132
2013-14	Quinnipiac	ECAC-W	FR	37	5	8	13	0.351

Historical Comparables (NCAA-W)

Player	League · Season · PPG	FR College PPG	School
Kendra Nealey	USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG	0.212	Cornell
Briana Mastel	NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG	0.258	Harvard
Heidi Niskanen	SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.19 PPG	0.000	RPI

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.