← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Mara Teschendorf Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.09
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0990
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.21
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.2480
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2010-11 Fargo North High USHS-W 21 10 13 23 1.095 0.0930 0.0930
2011-12 Fargo North High USHS-W 22 30 24 54 2.454 0.2084 0.2084
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2013-14 Wisconsin-Superior WIAC SO 21 2 1 3 0.143
2012-13 Wisconsin-Superior WIAC FR 24 2 3 5 0.208

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Mariah Gardner USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG 0.071 Minnesota State
Abby Halluska USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG 0.314 Bemidji State
Gabby Billing USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG 0.310 Dartmouth
Charly Dalhquist USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG 0.241 North Dakota
Sena Hanson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG 0.630 Brown

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Grace Karakas 2023-24 · 1.38 PPG 0.417 SUNY Cortland SUNYAC
Abigail Chamernick 2022-23 · 1.17 PPG 0.500 Hamline MIAC
Emily Heid 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG 0.593 Wisconsin-Superior WIAC
Adelina Gularte 2021-22 · 0.88 PPG 0.654 Alvernia UCHC
Emily Olson 2017-18 · 1.44 PPG 0.400 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.