← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Dynnea Bezona Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.08
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0920
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.19
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.2188
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2012-13 Arctic Bears USHS-W 24 10 11 21 0.875 0.0743 0.0743
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2017-18 Endicott NEHC JR 27 2 1 3 0.111
2016-17 Endicott NEHC SO 21 1 4 5 0.238
2015-16 Endicott NEHC FR 14 4 2 6 0.429

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Mallorie Iozzo USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG 0.069 Minnesota Duluth
Rose Rather NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG 0.824 Holy Cross
Sierra Semmel NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG 0.000 Maine
Sierra Smith USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG 0.000 Minnesota
Liz Trautz USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG 0.094 Colgate

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Eva Nelson 2023-24 · 0.52 PPG 0.393 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC
Audrey McClurg 2024-25 · 0.52 PPG Concordia MIAC
Autumn Burt 2023-24 · 0.50 PPG St. Catherine MIAC
Bea Palmer 2024-25 · 0.83 PPG 0.250 Bowdoin NESCAC
Jenna Horvat 2022-23 · 0.50 PPG St. Scholastica NCHA

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.