← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Annie Roche Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.14
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1592
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.38
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.4397
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2012-13 Chicago Romans Orange USHS-W 8 12 3 15 1.875 0.1592 0.1592
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2014-15 Colgate ECAC-W SO 12 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Colgate ECAC-W FR 32 0 0 0 0.000

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Molly Strabley NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG 0.103 Princeton
Grace Zumwinkle USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 1.000 Minnesota
Jordan Chancellor USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.517 Yale
Jessica Bonfe USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.08 PPG 0.206 Merrimack
Paetyn Levis USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.08 PPG 0.176 Ohio State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Daelyn Williams 2024-25 · 0.80 PPG 0.545 Salem State MASCAC
Molly Pohlkamp 2023-24 · 0.48 PPG 0.920 Wisconsin-Stevens Point WIAC
Greer Hardacre 2023-24 · 1.48 PPG 0.286 Saint Benedict MIAC
Kaiya Sandy 2021-22 · 0.77 PPG 0.571 Hamline MIAC
Emily Martino 2013-14 · 0.56 PPG 0.786 William Smith NEHC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.