Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Cushing | NE-Prep-Girls | 34 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.090 | 0.0292 | 0.0292 |
| 2022-23 | — | 19U-AAA-W | 19 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 0.842 | 0.3457 | 0.3457 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-27 | RPI | ECAC-W | SR | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2026-27 | RPI | ECAC | — | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2025-26 | RPI | ECAC-W | JR | 29 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.103 |
| 2024-25 | Merrimack | HEA-W | SO | 36 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 0.167 |
| 2023-24 | Merrimack | HEA-W | FR | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brooklynn Schugel | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.26 PPG | 0.270 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Brittany Wheeler | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.32 PPG | 0.111 | Yale |
| Rebekah Kolstad | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.32 PPG | 0.057 | North Dakota |
| Jordan McLaughlin | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.22 PPG | 0.294 | Minnesota State |
| Catherine Skaja | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.21 PPG | 0.342 | Minnesota |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jillayne Gilbert | 2014-15 · 2.40 PPG | 0.379 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Megan Killmer | 2010-11 · 1.12 PPG | 0.808 | St. Catherine | MIAC |
| Julianne Bradford | 2024-25 · 1.83 PPG | 0.500 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Taylor Ham | 2014-15 · 0.95 PPG | 0.962 | Manhattanville | UCHC |
| Erica Power | 2010-11 · 0.88 PPG | 1.038 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.