← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Isabel Wunder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-12-15 Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
1.21
Elite (0.70+)
Base NCAAe-W PPG1.1248
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×1.00
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
2.51
Elite (1.00+)
Base D3e-W PPG2.9316
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

65%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
35%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2021-22 Durham West Jr. Lightning OWHL-U22 30 32 51 83 2.767 0.9689 0.9689
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Princeton ECAC-W SR 34 27 16 43 1.265
2024-25 Princeton ECAC-W JR 32 26 24 50 1.562
2023-24 Princeton ECAC-W SO 32 8 27 35 1.094
2022-23 Princeton ECAC-W FR 31 9 9 18 0.581

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Maria Lindh SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG 0.306 Minnesota Duluth

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Sophia Hess 2024-25 · 1.86 PPG 1.935 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Nicole Unsworth 2014-15 · 3.75 PPG 0.960 SUNY Plattsburgh SUNYAC
Abbey Luth 2016-17 · 3.26 PPG 1.107 William Smith NEHC
Carly Moran 2012-13 · 3.08 PPG 1.097 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Sophie Rausch 2018-19 · 2.72 PPG 1.346 Hamline MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.