Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Calgary Edge School U18 Prep | CSSHL-U18W | 27 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 0.444 | 0.1018 | 0.1018 |
| 2022-23 | Calgary Edge School U18 Prep | CSSHL-U18W | 23 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 1.304 | 0.2988 | 0.2988 |
| 2023-24 | RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep | CSSHL-U18W | 30 | 15 | 24 | 39 | 1.300 | 0.2978 | 0.2978 |
| 2024-25 | RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep | CSSHL-U18W | 29 | 7 | 15 | 22 | 0.759 | 0.1738 | 0.1738 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-27 | Syracuse | CHA-W | SO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2025-26 | Syracuse | CHA-W | FR | 37 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 0.432 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gabbie Hughes | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.16 PPG | 1.121 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Laura Anderson | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.16 PPG | 0.290 | Yale |
| Liz Schepers | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG | 0.410 | Ohio State |
| Natalie Snodgrass | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG | 1.000 | UConn |
| Kaylee Druk | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG | 0.000 | Syracuse |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jenna Allen | 2023-24 · 0.93 PPG | 0.586 | Augsburg | MIAC |
| Grace Karakas | 2023-24 · 1.38 PPG | 0.417 | SUNY Cortland | SUNYAC |
| Mia Montanari | 2024-25 · 1.08 PPG | 0.500 | RPI | ECAC |
| Maggie Wohlleber | 2015-16 · 1.40 PPG | — | St. Norbert | NCHA |
| Maddy O'Malley | 2015-16 · 1.40 PPG | — | Arcadia | UCHC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.