Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Ontario Hockey Acad Juniors | OWHL-U22 | 23 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 0.304 | 0.1066 | 0.1066 |
| 2022-23 | OHA Mavericks Tardiff U22 | OWHL-U22 | 66 | 28 | 22 | 50 | 0.758 | 0.2653 | 0.2653 |
| 2023-24 | OHA Mavericks Tardiff U22 | OWHL-U22 | 65 | 22 | 29 | 51 | 0.785 | 0.2748 | 0.2748 |
| 2024-25 | OHA Mavericks Tardiff U22 | OWHL-U22 | 41 | 24 | 16 | 40 | 0.976 | 0.3417 | 0.3417 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Mercyhurst | CHA-W | FR | 27 | 4 | 12 | 16 | 0.593 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brooklynn Schugel | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.26 PPG | 0.270 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Jordan McLaughlin | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.22 PPG | 0.294 | Minnesota State |
| Catherine Skaja | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.21 PPG | 0.342 | Minnesota |
| Brittany Wheeler | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.32 PPG | 0.111 | Yale |
| Rebekah Kolstad | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.32 PPG | 0.057 | North Dakota |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dani Sibley | 2011-12 · 1.68 PPG | 0.733 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Jordan Hansen | 2015-16 · 1.16 PPG | 1.067 | Hamline | MIAC |
| Rilee Winters | 2021-22 · 1.23 PPG | 1.000 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Madison Nipper | 2016-17 · 3.42 PPG | 0.360 | New England College | NEHC |
| Nina Hudakova | 2022-23 · 1.28 PPG | 0.962 | Wilkes | UCHC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.