Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Moorhead High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 18 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 0.556 | 0.0839 | 0.0839 |
| 2021-22 | Moorhead High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 28 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 0.750 | 0.1132 | 0.1132 |
| 2022-23 | Moorhead High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 31 | 16 | 18 | 34 | 1.097 | 0.1656 | 0.1656 |
| 2023-24 | Moorhead High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 28 | 13 | 21 | 34 | 1.214 | 0.1834 | 0.1673 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Quinnipiac | ECAC-W | SO | 41 | 10 | 5 | 15 | 0.366 |
| 2024-25 | Quinnipiac | ECAC-W | FR | 29 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.138 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liz Schepers | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG | 0.410 | Ohio State |
| Paige Beebe | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.12 PPG | 0.472 | Bemidji State |
| Sofia Poinar | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.12 PPG | 0.028 | Minnesota State |
| Mallorie Iozzo | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.12 PPG | 0.069 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Andrea Renner | USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.00 PPG | 0.167 | Northeastern |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sophie Smith | 2024-25 · 1.04 PPG | 0.393 | Lake Forest | NCHA |
| Tala Gallaga | 2010-11 · 1.00 PPG | — | St. Olaf | MIAC |
| Lula Swanson | 2022-23 · 1.26 PPG | 0.333 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| McKayla Romano | 2024-25 · 0.62 PPG | 0.680 | Lebanon Valley | MAC |
| Malorie Anderson | 2023-24 · 1.04 PPG | — | Concordia | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.