Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Stanstead College Varsity (W) | CAHS-W | 49 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.265 | 0.0952 | 0.0952 |
| 2020-21 | Stanstead College Varsity (W) | CAHS-W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| 2021-22 | Stanstead College Varsity (W) | CAHS-W | 31 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 0.806 | 0.2894 | 0.2894 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | St. Cloud State | WCHA-W | SR | 29 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.241 |
| 2024-25 | St. Cloud State | WCHA-W | JR | 32 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.094 |
| 2023-24 | St. Cloud State | WCHA-W | SO | 28 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.071 |
| 2022-23 | St. Cloud State | WCHA-W | FR | 31 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.161 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Roethke | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG | 0.027 | UConn |
| Liz Schepers | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG | 0.410 | Ohio State |
| Sierra Alarid | USHS-W · 2012-13 · 3.69 PPG | 0.188 | Post |
| Emily Bergland | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG | 0.114 | Bemidji State |
| Paige Voight | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG | 0.559 | Merrimack |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexis Peterson | 2013-14 · 1.55 PPG | 0.476 | Marian | NCHA |
| Regina Metzler | 2022-23 · 0.74 PPG | 1.000 | Mercyhurst | AHA |
| Amelia Laskowski | 2022-23 · 0.71 PPG | 1.034 | Nazareth | UCHC |
| Sophie Martin | 2024-25 · 1.12 PPG | 0.667 | Bethel | MIAC |
| Kaiya Sandy | 2024-25 · 1.27 PPG | 0.571 | Hamline | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.