Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Kimball Union | NE-Prep-Girls | 22 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0.180 | 0.0585 | 0.0585 |
| 2018-19 | Kimball Union | NE-Prep-Girls | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Stonehill | NEWHA | SR | 37 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0.189 |
| 2024-25 | Stonehill | NEWHA | JR | 38 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.079 |
| 2023-24 | Stonehill | NEWHA | SO | 35 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 0.257 |
| 2022-23 | Stonehill | NEWHA | FR | 37 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 0.460 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sierra Smith | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota |
| Taylor Heise | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG | 0.897 | Minnesota |
| Rose Rather | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG | 0.824 | Holy Cross |
| Laura Anderson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG | 0.290 | Yale |
| Presley Norby | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG | 0.525 | Wisconsin |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Smythe | 2024-25 · 1.16 PPG | 0.105 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Kaitlin Roberts | 2023-24 · 0.31 PPG | — | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
| Karin Knapp | 2015-16 · 0.29 PPG | — | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Natalie Heutmaker | 2024-25 · 0.42 PPG | 0.280 | Norwich | LittleEast |
| Sophie Johnson | 2023-24 · 0.77 PPG | 0.143 | St. Scholastica | NCHA |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.