Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Okanagan HA U18 Prep Bl | CSSHL-U18W | 28 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 0.536 | 0.1227 | 0.1227 |
| 2022-23 | Okanagan HA U18 Prep | CSSHL-U18W | 30 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 0.767 | 0.1757 | 0.1757 |
| 2023-24 | RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep | CSSHL-U18W | 30 | 8 | 21 | 29 | 0.967 | 0.2215 | 0.2215 |
| 2024-25 | RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep | CSSHL-U18W | 30 | 8 | 18 | 26 | 0.867 | 0.1986 | 0.1986 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Vermont | HEA-W | FR | 35 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.171 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sydney Brodt | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.32 PPG | 0.600 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Jackie Pieper | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.32 PPG | 0.324 | Merrimack |
| Natalie Snodgrass | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.33 PPG | 1.000 | UConn |
| Sylvia Marolt | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.35 PPG | 0.000 | Bemidji State |
| Nicole Guagliardo | USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.27 PPG | 0.156 | Mercyhurst |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rylan Kissel | 2024-25 · 1.11 PPG | 0.577 | Bethel | MIAC |
| Marta Mazzocchi | 2022-23 · 0.90 PPG | 0.727 | Trinity | NESCAC |
| Elli Marvin | 2011-12 · 1.00 PPG | 0.640 | Saint Benedict | MIAC |
| Laken Muller | 2011-12 · 1.60 PPG | 0.400 | St. Catherine | MIAC |
| Emma Silkey | 2011-12 · 1.60 PPG | — | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.