Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Delta Hockey Academy U17 Prep | CSSHL-U18W | 27 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 0.852 | 0.1952 | 0.1952 |
| 2022-23 | Delta Hockey Acad. U18 Prep G | CSSHL-U18W | 30 | 8 | 17 | 25 | 0.833 | 0.1909 | 0.1909 |
| 2023-24 | Delta Hockey Acad. U18 Prep G | CSSHL-U18W | 29 | 6 | 24 | 30 | 1.034 | 0.2370 | 0.2370 |
| 2024-25 | Delta Hockey Acad. U18 Prep G | CSSHL-U18W | 30 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 0.833 | 0.1909 | 0.1909 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Cornell | ECAC-W | FR | 33 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.061 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joie Phelps | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.26 PPG | 0.182 | Cornell |
| Nicole Guagliardo | USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.27 PPG | 0.156 | Mercyhurst |
| Kiki Radke | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.24 PPG | 0.273 | Bemidji State |
| Mac Johnson | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.22 PPG | 0.125 | St. Cloud State |
| Sydney Brodt | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.32 PPG | 0.600 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sierra Hanowski | 2012-13 · 1.64 PPG | 0.375 | St. Scholastica | NCHA |
| Sara Taffe | 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG | 0.667 | Hamilton | NESCAC |
| Natalie Simons | 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG | 0.571 | Bethel | MIAC |
| Taylor Holm | 2021-22 · 0.61 PPG | 1.000 | Post | CHA-W |
| Samantha Young | 2013-14 · 1.35 PPG | 0.455 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.