Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Noble & Greenough | NE-Prep-Girls | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| 2022-23 | — | 16U-AAA-W | 4 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.750 | 0.2663 | 0.2663 |
| 2023-24 | Noble & Greenough | NE-Prep-Girls | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| 2024-25 | — | 19U-AAA-W | 9 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.556 | 0.2281 | 0.2281 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-27 | Northeastern | HEA-W | SO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2025-26 | Northeastern | HEA-W | FR | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Roethke | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.52 PPG | 0.027 | UConn |
| Sydney Brodt | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG | 0.600 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Brooklynn Schugel | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.54 PPG | 0.270 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Taylor Wente | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG | 0.658 | Minnesota |
| Demi Gardner | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.55 PPG | 0.250 | Minnesota State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emily Heid | 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG | 0.593 | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC |
| Abigail Chamernick | 2022-23 · 1.17 PPG | 0.500 | Hamline | MIAC |
| Harley Kinney | 2013-14 · 1.50 PPG | — | Marian | NCHA |
| Reghan Bork | 2018-19 · 1.50 PPG | 0.400 | Concordia | MIAC |
| Talya Bent | 2010-11 · 1.50 PPG | — | Southern Maine | NEHC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.