← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Annabelle Williams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-06-02 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.04
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0442
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.09
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.1070
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

2%
NCAA D1W
8%
NCAA D3W
90%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 Rosemount High (women) USHS-MN-W 29 0 0 0 0.000 N/A N/A
2024-25 Rosemount High (women) USHS-MN-W 30 1 2 3 0.100 0.0151 0.0149
2025-26 Rosemount High (women) USHS-MN-W 27 3 9 12 0.444 0.0671 0.0637
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Rose Rather NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG 0.824 Holy Cross
Sierra Smith USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG 0.000 Minnesota
Taylor Heise USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG 0.897 Minnesota
Mallorie Iozzo USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG 0.069 Minnesota Duluth
Laura Anderson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG 0.290 Yale

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Grace Bailey 2024-25 · 0.38 PPG Gustavus Adolphus MIAC
Talia Domschot 2024-25 · 1.38 PPG 0.115 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC
Mikayla Murray 2023-24 · 0.45 PPG 0.316 Trinity NESCAC
Brynn Thoma 2024-25 · 0.36 PPG Concordia MIAC
Maren Brown 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG 0.333 UMass Boston MASCAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.