← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Jessica Pate Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.20
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2380
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.49
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.5767
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2010-11 Simley High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 16 21 37 1.480 0.2235 0.2235
2011-12 Simley High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 16 25 41 1.640 0.2476 0.2476
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2014-15 St. Olaf MIAC FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Taylor Williamson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.64 PPG 0.395 Minnesota
Emily Gunderson USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.64 PPG 0.171 Lindenwood
Sophia Kunin USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.62 PPG 0.425 Wisconsin
Christi Vetter USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.67 PPG 0.000 Penn State
Sierra Alarid USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.93 PPG 0.188 Post

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Emily Heid 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG 0.593 Wisconsin-Superior WIAC
Abigail Chamernick 2022-23 · 1.17 PPG 0.500 Hamline MIAC
Harley Kinney 2013-14 · 1.50 PPG — Marian NCHA
Reghan Bork 2018-19 · 1.50 PPG 0.400 Concordia MIAC
Talya Bent 2010-11 · 1.50 PPG — Southern Maine NEHC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.