← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Anna Daniels Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-03-27 Country: Sweden
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.40
Average (0.25–0.45)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.4649
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.83
Strong (0.65–1.00)
Base D3e-W PPG0.9748
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2010-11 Leksands IF SDHL 25 4 4 8 0.320 0.3742 0.4209
2011-12 Leksands IF SDHL 28 12 7 19 0.679 0.7936 0.8427
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2015-16 Castleton NEHC SR 23 2 10 12 0.522
2014-15 Castleton NEHC JR 27 10 12 22 0.815
2013-14 Castleton NEHC SO 27 14 17 31 1.148
2012-13 Castleton NEHC FR 23 11 9 20 0.870

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Caitrin Lonergan NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.44 PPG 0.892 Boston College
Maria Lindh SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG 0.306 Minnesota Duluth

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Maddie Evangelous 2014-15 · 1.80 PPG 0.885 Elmira UCHC
Emma Crocker 2015-16 · 2.06 PPG 0.769 Elmira UCHC
Mikaila Rubin 2015-16 · 2.42 PPG 0.654 Nazareth UCHC
Molly Garin 2015-16 · 1.24 PPG 1.267 Hamline MIAC
Ivy Boric 2018-19 · 1.21 PPG 1.296 SUNY Plattsburgh SUNYAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.