← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Danielle Marmer

Position: Forward DOB: Unknown Country: Unknown
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.08
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0963
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.18
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.2107
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2012-13 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep-Girls 23 5 4 9 0.390 0.1267 0.1267
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2014-15 Quinnipiac ECAC-W SO 33 1 2 3 0.091
2013-14 Quinnipiac ECAC-W FR 29 0 0 0 0.000

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Holly Dietzler USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG 0.108 Lindenwood
Jessica Bonfe USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG 0.206 Merrimack
Kylie Hanley USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG 0.143 Minnesota Duluth
Suvi Ollikainen SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG 0.151 St. Cloud State
Amanda Bäckebo SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG 0.056 Syracuse

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Allie LeClaire 2023-24 · 0.79 PPG 0.333 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Tallulah Bryant 2022-23 · 1.00 PPG 0.273 Lake Forest NCHA
Anna Rausch 2024-25 · 0.86 PPG 0.312 St. Norbert NCHA
Olivia Patnode 2022-23 · 0.63 PPG — Saint Mary's MIAC
Charlotte Bellmont 2024-25 · 0.69 PPG — Saint Benedict MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.