Vermont
Set Commitment
NCAA Division I Women's
Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.05
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0596
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1
NCAA D3W
Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.18
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.2154
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1
D1W / D3W Likelihood
0%
NCAA D1W
8%
NCAA D3W
92%
Club / Other
Based on 40 comparable players
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG
Pre-College Seasons
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Toronto Leaside Wildcats | OWHL-U22 | 47 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0.170 | 0.0596 | 0.0596 |
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent · COVID-flagged seasons in yellow
Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sierra Smith | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota |
| Taylor Heise | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG | 0.897 | Minnesota |
| Rose Rather | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG | 0.824 | Holy Cross |
| Laura Anderson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG | 0.290 | Yale |
| Presley Norby | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG | 0.525 | Wisconsin |
Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aubree McDonagh | 2023-24 · 0.59 PPG | 0.360 | St. Catherine | MIAC |
| Audrey McClurg | 2024-25 · 0.52 PPG | — | Concordia | MIAC |
| Kylie Ligday | 2022-23 · 0.81 PPG | 0.280 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
| Bea Palmer | 2024-25 · 0.83 PPG | 0.250 | Bowdoin | NESCAC |
| Eva Nelson | 2023-24 · 0.52 PPG | 0.393 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.