← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Bria Schilling Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-10-16 Country: USA Height: 5'5" (165 cm)
NCAA-W Projection
Cornell
Verbal ECAC-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — ECAC-W
0.24
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2777
Conf. Strength1.010
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.64
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.7461
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

25%
NCAA D1W
12%
NCAA D3W
62%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 — 16U-AAA-W 18 9 3 12 0.667 0.2367 0.2367
2025-26 — 19U-AAA-W 35 7 19 26 0.743 0.3050 0.3050
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Sierra Alarid USHS-W · 2012-13 · 3.69 PPG 0.188 Post
Emily Bergland USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG 0.114 Bemidji State
Lindsay Roethke USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG 0.027 UConn
Catherine Skaja USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG 0.342 Minnesota
Rebekah Kolstad USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.09 PPG 0.057 North Dakota

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Olivia Aquino 2024-25 · 2.00 PPG — RPI ECAC
Amber Heidenreich 2016-17 · 1.61 PPG 0.500 Wisconsin-Superior WIAC
Celena Rea 2018-19 · 0.92 PPG 0.870 Nazareth UCHC
Erin Olson 2017-18 · 1.25 PPG 0.640 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Hailey Adair 2012-13 · 1.28 PPG 0.630 Wisconsin-Superior WIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.