← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Caroline Clark Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-03-19 Country: USA Height: 5'4" (163 cm)
NCAA-W Projection
Syracuse
Verbal CHA-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.25
Average (0.25–0.45)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2965
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.70
Strong (0.65–1.00)
Base D3e-W PPG0.8231
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

25%
NCAA D1W
15%
NCAA D3W
60%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 16U-AAA-W 32 15 13 28 0.875 0.3125 0.3125
2025-26 16U-AAA-W 25 14 6 20 0.800 0.2858 0.2858
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Liz Schepers USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG 0.410 Ohio State
Lindsay Roethke USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG 0.027 UConn
Paige Voight USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG 0.559 Merrimack
Amy Petersen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG 0.784 Penn State
Emily Bergland USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG 0.114 Bemidji State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Emilee Anderson 2016-17 · 1.65 PPG 0.480 St. Catherine MIAC
Bella LaMere 2021-22 · 1.79 PPG 0.444 St. Olaf MIAC
Lauren Ballinger 2023-24 · 1.38 PPG 0.556 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Emma Hart 2021-22 · 0.98 PPG 0.808 Alvernia UCHC
Elizabeth Tabaka 2013-14 · 1.29 PPG 0.615 Augsburg MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.