← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Amanda Ranaudo

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-06-13 Country: Unknown
NCAA-W Projection
Sacred Heart
Verbal NEWHA D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.16
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1826
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.42
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.4905
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

12%
NCAA D1W
20%
NCAA D3W
68%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 16U-AAA-W 19 8 1 9 0.474 0.1692 0.1692
2024-25 Canterbury NE-Prep-Girls 25 0 0 0 0.000 N/A N/A
2025-26 19U-AAA-W 15 2 5 7 0.467 0.1916 0.1916
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Joie Phelps USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.26 PPG 0.182 Cornell
Nicole Guagliardo USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.27 PPG 0.156 Mercyhurst
Kiki Radke USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.24 PPG 0.273 Bemidji State
Sydney Brodt USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.32 PPG 0.600 Minnesota Duluth
Jackie Pieper USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.32 PPG 0.324 Merrimack

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Gracyn Knowles 2024-25 · 0.92 PPG 0.548 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Mackenzie Rugland 2016-17 · 1.26 PPG St. Scholastica NCHA
Payton Rudiger 2015-16 · 1.16 PPG 0.435 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Jaci Reinke 2010-11 · 1.40 PPG 0.360 Hamline MIAC
Lizzy Morsching 2018-19 · 1.26 PPG Saint Benedict MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.