← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Corinne Leibowitz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-01-01 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
RPI
Verbal ECAC-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — ECAC-W
0.04
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0499
Conf. Strength1.010
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.12
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.1344
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

0%
NCAA D1W
5%
NCAA D3W
95%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2022-23 — 16U-AAA-W 8 0 0 0 0.000 N/A N/A
2023-24 — 16U-AAA-W 43 1 5 6 0.140 0.0495 0.0495
2025-26 — 19U-AAA-W 41 1 4 5 0.122 0.0501 0.0501
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Presley Norby USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG 0.525 Wisconsin
Laura Anderson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG 0.290 Yale
Carly Lang USHS-W · 2012-13 · 0.58 PPG 0.000 Clarkson
Taylor Heise USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG 0.897 Minnesota
Sierra Smith USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG 0.000 Minnesota

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Kellsey Kludt 2024-25 · 0.68 PPG 0.200 St. Olaf MIAC
Amanda Smythe 2024-25 · 1.16 PPG 0.105 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Merrill Delich 2023-24 · 0.28 PPG 0.500 Saint Benedict MIAC
Emma Halweg 2022-23 · 0.36 PPG — Saint Benedict MIAC
Rylie Griffiths 2025-26 · 0.31 PPG — Post NE10

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.