← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Annika Stock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-01-01 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
Quinnipiac
Verbal ECAC-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — ECAC-W
0.27
Average (0.25–0.45)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.3147
Conf. Strength1.010
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.73
Strong (0.65–1.00)
Base D3e-W PPG0.8471
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

30%
NCAA D1W
12%
NCAA D3W
57%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 — 16U-AAA-W 43 12 11 23 0.535 0.1899 0.1899
2024-25 — 16U-AAA-W 50 16 25 41 0.820 0.2912 0.2912
2025-26 — 19U-AAA-W 41 18 15 33 0.805 0.3304 0.3304
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Carly Bullock USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.20 PPG 0.812 Princeton
Karlie Lund USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.20 PPG 1.182 Princeton
Catherine Skaja USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.21 PPG 0.342 Minnesota
Haley Mack USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG 0.371 Bemidji State
Emily Bergland USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG 0.114 Bemidji State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Ari Smith 2011-12 · 2.17 PPG — Elmira UCHC
Casey Brown 2010-11 · 2.18 PPG — Hamilton NESCAC
Jillian Bilsborough 2023-24 · 1.82 PPG 0.481 Aurora NCHA
Bre Simon 2013-14 · 0.88 PPG 1.000 Hamline MIAC
Alyson Niebur 2017-18 · 1.44 PPG 0.600 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.