← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Reid Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-04-08 Country: Canada
2025 · Round 1, Pick #21  ·  Nashville Predators Nashville Predators
Michigan
Verbal BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Kitchener Rangers OHL 49 2 21 23 0.469 0.2715 0.2978 1.2061 1.3229
2024-25 Kitchener Rangers OHL 67 14 40 54 0.806 0.4663 0.4874 2.0710 2.1647
2025-26 Kitchener Rangers OHL 57 15 41 56 0.983 0.5684 0.5655 2.5245 2.5118
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1363
Defenseman overall
#115
Defenseman born in 2007
#346
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Boston College (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2023-24
0.62
actual FR PPG at Michigan
NTDP-U18 2021-22
0.78
actual FR PPG at Michigan
OHL 2023-24
0.90
actual FR PPG at Michigan
USHL 2020-21
0.95
actual FR PPG at Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Fitchburg State · 2016-17
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.