IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian McCoshen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-08-05 Country: USA
2013 · Round 1, Pick #31  ·  Florida Panthers Florida Panthers
Signed Professionally
Shanghai Dragons · KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 42 0 6 6 0.143 0.0843 0.0978 0.4292 0.4980
2011-12 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 55 8 12 20 0.364 0.2145 0.2389 1.0920 1.2161
2012-13 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 53 11 33 44 0.830 0.4897 0.5193 2.4934 2.6440
2022-23 Ässät Liiga 59 7 21 28 0.475 1.1865 1.1060 4.0797 3.8028
2024-25 Shanghai Dragons KHL 61 4 11 15 0.246 0.6148 0.5386 3.3882 2.9681
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 40 6 15 21 0.525
2014-15 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 35 6 10 16 0.457
2013-14 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 35 5 8 13 0.371
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.38
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2013-14 · Boston College
-3.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#458
Defenseman overall
#143
Defenseman born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Gus Katsuras
Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Landrigan
Utica · 2016-17
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.