Ian McCoshen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-08-05 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2010-11	Waterloo Black Hawks	USHL	42	0	6	6	0.143	0.0878	0.1019	0.4210	0.4885
2011-12	Waterloo Black Hawks	USHL	55	8	12	20	0.364	0.2235	0.2489	1.0712	1.1929
2012-13	Waterloo Black Hawks	USHL	53	11	33	44	0.830	0.5103	0.5411	2.4459	2.5936
2022-23	Ässät	Liiga	59	7	21	28	0.475	1.1865	1.1060	—	—
2024-25	Shanghai Dragons	KHL	61	4	11	15	0.246	0.6148	0.5386	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2015-16	Boston College	D1	HockeyEast	—	40	6	15	21	0.525
2014-15	Boston College	D1	HockeyEast	—	35	6	10	16	0.457
2013-14	Boston College	D1	HockeyEast	—	35	5	8	13	0.371

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.40

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.37

2013-14 · Boston College

-7.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

92%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#456

Defenseman overall

#142

Defenseman born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Reifler

Elmira · 2017-18

1.067 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Lucas Signoretti

Buffalo State · 2023-24

1.120 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Zach Dill

Salem State · 2021-22

1.111 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.