IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Ellis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-05-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 37 0 2 2 0.054 0.0151 0.0163 0.0373 0.0402
2001-02 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 48 7 14 21 0.438 0.1222 0.1255 0.3019 0.3100
2002-03 — OJHL 48 36 51 87 1.812 0.5064 0.4989 1.2508 1.2324
2003-04 Oakville Blades OJHL 28 12 23 35 1.250 0.3492 0.3283 0.8626 0.8111
2004-05 Oakville Blades OJHL 49 31 51 82 1.673 0.4676 0.4161 1.1549 1.0277
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 25 13 16 29 1.160
2007-08 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 25 17 21 38 1.520
2006-07 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 26 16 26 42 1.615
2005-06 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 27 21 25 46 1.704
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.70
2005-06 · SUNY Oswego
+422.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4145
Forward overall
#134
Forward born in 1984
#45
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Adams
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Domsodi
Wentworth · 2010-11
1.250 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Cousineau
Adrian · 2009-10
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Meers
Trine · 2018-19
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.