IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

T.J. Sarcona Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-06-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Chicago Steel USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 53 12 13 25 0.472 0.1675 0.1742 0.4952 0.5149
2011-12 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 56 23 35 58 1.036 0.3679 0.3644 1.0874 1.0771
2012-13 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 54 20 37 57 1.056 0.3749 0.3525 1.1083 1.0421
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Niagara D1 AHA — 38 2 9 11 0.289
2015-16 Niagara D1 AHA — 31 7 4 11 0.355
2014-15 Niagara D1 AHA — 29 5 13 18 0.621
2013-14 Niagara D1 AHA — 38 11 11 22 0.579
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2013-14 · Niagara
+89.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10806
Forward overall
#435
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Morgan
New England · 2017-18
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitchell McPherson
Hamline · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Zack Bross
UMass Boston · 2016-17
1.518 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.