IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Davey Middleton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-05-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Tri-City Storm USHL 17 0 2 2 0.118 0.0694 0.0694 0.3532 0.3532
2011-12 — USHL 48 16 14 30 0.625 0.3687 0.3515 1.8771 1.7895
2012-13 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 60 13 17 30 0.500 0.2949 0.2654 1.5017 1.3517
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Brown D1 ECAC SR 31 2 3 5 0.161
2015-16 Brown D1 ECAC JR 31 3 4 7 0.226
2014-15 Brown D1 ECAC SO 31 3 3 6 0.194
2013-14 Brown D1 ECAC FR 29 0 3 3 0.103
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2013-14 · Brown
-59.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18219
Forward overall
#696
Forward born in 1992
#1775
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

A.J. Shiverdecker
Westfield State · 2007-08
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny Liscio
SUNY Morrisville · 2014-15
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Trent Flory
Utica · 2000-01
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.