IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

A.J. Shiverdecker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-04-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 North Bay Skyhawks NOJHL 44 6 19 25 0.568 0.0968 0.0946 0.2408 0.2353
2007-08 North Bay Skyhawks NOJHL 47 18 35 53 1.128 0.1920 0.1765 0.4779 0.4394
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SR 25 5 9 14 0.560
2010-11 Westfield State D3 MASCAC JR 24 6 11 17 0.708
2009-10 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SO 26 7 9 16 0.615
2008-09 Westfield State D3 MASCAC FR 24 8 21 29 1.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.21
2008-09 · Westfield State
+882.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26454
Forward overall
#841
Forward born in 1987
#248
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan McCormack
Canton · 2018-19
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Ingraham
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2007-08
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Satalino
Lawrence · 2016-17
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.