← New Search ↗ Social Card

A.J. Shiverdecker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-04-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 North Bay Skyhawks NOJHL 44 6 19 25 0.568 0.0958 0.0936 0.2361 0.2307
2007-08 North Bay Skyhawks NOJHL 47 18 35 53 1.128 0.1901 0.1748 0.4686 0.4308
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SR 25 5 9 14 0.560
2010-11 Westfield State D3 MASCAC JR 24 6 11 17 0.708
2009-10 Westfield State D3 SO 26 7 9 16 0.615
2008-09 Westfield State D3 FR 24 8 21 29 1.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.21
2008-09 · Westfield State
+892.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27438
Forward overall
#1052
Forward born in 1987
#232
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2005-06
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2018-19
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.