IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brad Dormiedy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-04-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Bowmanville Eagles OJHL 48 13 20 33 0.688 0.1921 0.1984 0.4744 0.4900
2003-04 Bowmanville Eagles OJHL 39 13 28 41 1.051 0.2937 0.2902 0.7255 0.7168
2004-05 Bowmanville Eagles OJHL 38 16 19 35 0.921 0.2574 0.2413 0.6357 0.5959
2005-06 Bowmanville Eagles OJHL 45 16 28 44 0.978 0.2732 0.2460 0.6748 0.6077
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 29 4 21 25 0.862
2008-09 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 21 2 6 8 0.381
2007-08 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 26 3 8 11 0.423
2006-07 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 25 6 5 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2006-07 · SUNY Oswego
+110.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12533
Forward overall
#456
Forward born in 1985
#684
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dakota Zarudny
SUNY Geneseo · 2021-22
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dakota Ulmer
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Mohler
Curry · 2007-08
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.