← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brad Dormiedy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-04-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Bowmanville Eagles OJHL 48 13 20 33 0.688 0.1685 0.1740 0.4733 0.4889
2003-04 Bowmanville Eagles OJHL 39 13 28 41 1.051 0.2577 0.2546 0.7238 0.7151
2004-05 Bowmanville Eagles OJHL 38 16 19 35 0.921 0.2258 0.2117 0.6342 0.5945
2005-06 Bowmanville Eagles OJHL 45 16 28 44 0.978 0.2397 0.2159 0.6732 0.6063
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 29 4 21 25 0.862
2008-09 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 21 2 6 8 0.381
2007-08 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 26 3 8 11 0.423
2006-07 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 25 6 5 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2006-07 · SUNY Oswego
+139.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16775
Forward overall
#541
Forward born in 1985
#577
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2021-22
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2015-16
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.