← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christian Lloyd Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-05-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 10 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Toronto Patriots OJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1226 0.1306 0.3443 0.3669
2013-14 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 52 1 25 26 0.500 0.1226 0.1244 0.3443 0.3493
2014-15 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 51 17 35 52 1.020 0.2499 0.2406 0.7020 0.6759
2015-16 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 59 13 32 45 0.763 0.2558 0.2361 0.7058 0.6513
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Elmira D1 UCHC SR 24 6 13 19 0.792
2019-20 Elmira D3 UCHC 24 6 13 19 0.792
2018-19 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 2 0 1 1 0.500
2017-18 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 27 0 3 3 0.111
2016-17 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 6 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#4711
Defenseman overall
#822
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2023-24
1.269 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.