| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | — | USHL | 55 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 0.200 | 0.1274 | 0.1343 | 0.5993 | 0.6316 |
| 2010-11 | Fargo Force | USHL | 32 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.125 | 0.0796 | 0.0799 | 0.3746 | 0.3759 |
| 2011-12 | Lincoln Stars | USHL | 50 | 0 | 11 | 11 | 0.220 | 0.1401 | 0.1340 | 0.6593 | 0.6308 |
| 2012-13 | Dubuque Fighting Saints | USHL | 55 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 0.236 | 0.1505 | 0.1360 | 0.7084 | 0.6400 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Alabama-Huntsville | D1 | — | SR | 15 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.067 |
| 2015-16 | Alabama-Huntsville | D1 | — | JR | 31 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.161 |
| 2014-15 | Alabama-Huntsville | D1 | — | SO | 38 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0.263 |
| 2013-14 | Alabama-Huntsville | D1 | — | FR | 36 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.111 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.