← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Carlson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-06-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 USHL 55 5 6 11 0.200 0.1180 0.1244 0.6007 0.6331
2010-11 Fargo Force USHL 32 2 2 4 0.125 0.0737 0.0740 0.3754 0.3767
2011-12 Lincoln Stars USHL 50 0 11 11 0.220 0.1298 0.1242 0.6607 0.6321
2012-13 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 55 4 9 13 0.236 0.1395 0.1260 0.7100 0.6415
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Alabama-Huntsville D1 SR 15 0 1 1 0.067
2015-16 Alabama-Huntsville D1 JR 31 3 2 5 0.161
2014-15 Alabama-Huntsville D1 SO 38 5 5 10 0.263
2013-14 Alabama-Huntsville D1 FR 36 1 3 4 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2013-14 · Alabama-Huntsville
-6.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13397
Defenseman overall
#1569
Defenseman born in 1992
#3563
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2011-12
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2018-19
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.