← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Carlson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-06-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 USHL 55 5 6 11 0.200 0.1274 0.1343 0.5993 0.6316
2010-11 Fargo Force USHL 32 2 2 4 0.125 0.0796 0.0799 0.3746 0.3759
2011-12 Lincoln Stars USHL 50 0 11 11 0.220 0.1401 0.1340 0.6593 0.6308
2012-13 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 55 4 9 13 0.236 0.1505 0.1360 0.7084 0.6400
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Alabama-Huntsville D1 SR 15 0 1 1 0.067
2015-16 Alabama-Huntsville D1 JR 31 3 2 5 0.161
2014-15 Alabama-Huntsville D1 SO 38 5 5 10 0.263
2013-14 Alabama-Huntsville D1 FR 36 1 3 4 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2013-14 · Alabama-Huntsville
-12.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8714
Defenseman overall
#1322
Defenseman born in 1992
#3620
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anna Maria · 2018-19
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2018-19
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2014-15
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.