IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dominic Racobaldo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-06-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Omaha Lancers USHL 41 0 5 5 0.122 0.0777 0.0778 0.3656 0.3663
2011-12 — USHL 56 1 10 11 0.196 0.1251 0.1195 0.5886 0.5622
2012-13 — USHL 60 7 13 20 0.333 0.2122 0.1914 0.9988 0.9008
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 American International D1 AHA SR 25 1 3 4 0.160
2016-17 American International D1 AHA SR 25 0 1 1 0.040
2014-15 American International D1 AHA SO 36 1 2 3 0.083
2013-14 American International D1 AHA FR 32 1 3 4 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2013-14 · American International
-18.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6839
Defenseman overall
#1176
Defenseman born in 1992
#3388
in USHL

D1 Comparables

John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Duszynski
Norwich · 2009-10
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Beau Orser
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Simpson
St. Scholastica · 2013-14
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.