← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dominic Racobaldo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-06-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Omaha Lancers USHL 41 0 5 5 0.122 0.0720 0.0721 0.3664 0.3671
2011-12 USHL 56 1 10 11 0.196 0.1159 0.1107 0.5899 0.5634
2012-13 USHL 60 7 13 20 0.333 0.1966 0.1773 1.0010 0.9028
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 American International D1 AHA SR 25 1 3 4 0.160
2016-17 American International D1 AHA SR 25 0 1 1 0.040
2015-16 American International D1 AHA 0 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 American International D1 AHA SO 36 1 2 3 0.083
2013-14 American International D1 AHA FR 32 1 3 4 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2013-14 · American International
-12.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10950
Defenseman overall
#1400
Defenseman born in 1992
#3338
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2009-10
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2013-14
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.