IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Simpson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-06-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2011-12 Canmore Eagles AJHL 52 15 12 27 0.519 0.1734 0.1784 0.4820 0.4960
2012-13 Canmore Eagles AJHL 60 26 18 44 0.733 0.2449 0.2395 0.6807 0.6656
2013-14 Canmore Eagles AJHL 38 20 17 37 0.974 0.3252 0.3011 0.9039 0.8370
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 28 12 14 26 0.929
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.93
2014-15 · St. Scholastica
+292.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13227
Forward overall
#484
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Conor Foley
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.710 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Owen Sikich
Saint Mary's · 2017-18
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Valadao
Curry · 2013-14
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.