IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Sposit Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-02-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Chicago Hitmen NAHL 39 10 11 21 0.538 0.1999 0.1853 0.5702 0.5286
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Nichols D3 CNE SR 27 6 8 14 0.518
2013-14 Nichols D3 CNE JR 27 13 10 23 0.852
2012-13 Nichols D3 CNE SO 23 9 10 19 0.826
2011-12 Nichols D3 CNE FR 27 13 8 21 0.778
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2011-12 · Nichols
+390.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20246
Forward overall
#836
Forward born in 1990
#1928
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Johnny Hurd
Tufts · 2021-22
1.087 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Philip Elgstam
Norwich · 2018-19
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joel Wetmore
Utica · 2011-12
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.