← New Search ↗ Social Card

Philip Elgstam Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-11 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 New Jersey Rockets EHL 29 13 14 27 0.931 0.2151 0.2351 0.4555 0.4978
2016-17 New Jersey Rockets EHL 32 16 10 26 0.812 0.1877 0.1966 0.3976 0.4165
2017-18 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 46 12 9 21 0.457 0.1861 0.1833 0.3669 0.3614
2018-19 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 50 25 39 64 1.280 0.5219 0.4843 1.0289 0.9547
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 22 9 6 15 0.682
2021-22 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 19 6 8 14 0.737
2020-21 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 6 1 5 6 1.000
2019-20 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 22 5 4 9 0.409
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2019-20 · Norwich
+31.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
8%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5570
Forward overall
#254
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2012-13
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2021-22
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.