← New Search ↗ Social Card

Philip Elgstam Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-11 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 New Jersey Rockets EHL 29 13 14 27 0.931 0.1998 0.2184 0.4559 0.4982
2016-17 New Jersey Rockets EHL 32 16 10 26 0.812 0.1744 0.1827 0.3979 0.4169
2017-18 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 46 12 9 21 0.457 0.1286 0.1267 0.3696 0.3641
2018-19 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 50 25 39 64 1.280 0.3607 0.3347 1.0363 0.9616
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 22 9 6 15 0.682
2021-22 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 19 6 8 14 0.737
2020-21 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 6 1 5 6 1.000
2019-20 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 22 5 4 9 0.409
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2019-20 · Norwich
+90.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15169
Forward overall
#547
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2011-12
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2021-22
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.