← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Mingoia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-01-18 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Västerås IK · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Tri-City Storm USHL 43 13 26 39 0.907 0.5776 0.5101 2.7180 2.4003
2018-19 Rögle BK SHL 26 7 5 12 0.462
2019-20 KooKoo Liiga 52 20 21 41 0.788
2020-21 KooKoo Liiga 21 7 16 23 1.095
2021-22 Grizzlys Wolfsburg DEL 47 15 32 47 1.000
2022-23 Grizzlys Wolfsburg DEL 42 10 21 31 0.738
2023-24 Kärpät Liiga 6 0 2 2 0.333
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Providence D1 HockeyEast SR 36 14 23 37 1.028
2014-15 Providence D1 HockeyEast JR 40 15 16 31 0.775
2013-14 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 26 5 10 15 0.577
2011-12 Union D1 ECAC FR 18 3 3 6 0.333

NCAAe Rankings

#1579
Forward overall
#78
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.