IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Fox Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-03-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Pickering Panthers OJHL 47 10 15 25 0.532 0.1304 0.1348 0.3662 0.3785
2005-06 Pickering Panthers OJHL 46 28 35 63 1.370 0.3357 0.3346 0.9430 0.9399
2006-07 — OJHL 50 34 38 72 1.440 0.3529 0.3341 0.9914 0.9385
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 28 10 22 32 1.143
2009-10 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 27 14 33 47 1.741
2008-09 Salem State D3 MASCAC SO 21 16 18 34 1.619
2007-08 Salem State D3 MASCAC FR 28 18 22 40 1.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.43
2007-08 · Salem State
+399.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11286
Forward overall
#385
Forward born in 1987
#227
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Dunner
Fredonia · 2015-16
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Anderson
Norwich · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Corey Stark
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.