IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Fox Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-03-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Pickering Panthers OJHL 47 10 15 25 0.532 0.1486 0.1536 0.3671 0.3794
2005-06 Pickering Panthers OJHL 46 28 35 63 1.370 0.3827 0.3814 0.9452 0.9421
2006-07 — OJHL 50 34 38 72 1.440 0.4023 0.3808 0.9937 0.9407
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 28 10 22 32 1.143
2009-10 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 27 14 33 47 1.741
2008-09 Salem State D3 — SO 21 16 18 34 1.619
2007-08 Salem State D3 — FR 28 18 22 40 1.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.43
2007-08 · Salem State
+338.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8083
Forward overall
#336
Forward born in 1987
#260
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Corey Stark
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Quigley
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Dunner
Fredonia · 2015-16
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.