IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Corey Stark Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-04-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Lone Star Cavalry NAHL 40 10 5 15 0.375 0.1392 0.1420 0.3971 0.4052
2004-05 Santa Fe Roadrunners NAHL 56 22 29 51 0.911 0.3381 0.3281 0.9642 0.9358
2005-06 Santa Fe Roadrunners NAHL 58 37 33 70 1.207 0.4481 0.4127 1.2779 1.1769
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — SO 7 3 2 5 0.714
2006-07 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — FR 26 17 10 27 1.038
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2006-07 · Wisconsin-Superior
+220.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7837
Forward overall
#264
Forward born in 1985
#216
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Galati
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Yann Poirier
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.030 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Docking
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.