IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Galati Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-05-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Toronto Patriots OJHL 42 13 10 23 0.548 0.1530 0.1616 0.3779 0.3992
2010-11 — OJHL 50 19 32 51 1.020 0.2850 0.2878 0.7039 0.7108
2011-12 — OJHL 49 12 26 38 0.775 0.2167 0.2092 0.5352 0.5168
2012-13 — OJHL 54 30 21 51 0.944 0.2639 0.2417 0.6517 0.5968
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 27 13 17 30 1.111
2015-16 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 25 8 14 22 0.880
2014-15 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 28 12 17 29 1.036
2013-14 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 29 24 12 36 1.241
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.24
2013-14 · SUNY Oswego
+534.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14223
Forward overall
#621
Forward born in 1992
#836
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Way
Augsburg · 2004-05
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stefano Alonzi
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Lopez
Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.