IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Way Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-05-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Thornhill Rattlers OJHL 7 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2003-04 Green Mountain Glades EJHL 48 23 28 51 1.062 0.3148 0.3035 — —
2004-05 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 34 12 27 39 1.147 0.2488 0.2260 0.8875 0.8062
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 25 1 2 3 0.120
2007-08 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 23 2 9 11 0.478
2006-07 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 26 6 6 12 0.462
2005-06 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 25 7 6 13 0.520
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2005-06 · Augsburg
+136.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20248
Forward overall
#596
Forward born in 1984

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Davis
Neumann · 2013-14
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hayden Stocks
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Dreger
Neumann · 2009-10
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.