IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eli Lichtenwald Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-06-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 56 21 24 45 0.804 0.2322 0.2421 0.6050 0.6308
2011-12 Omaha Lancers USHL 42 5 14 19 0.452 0.2881 0.2754 1.3557 1.2959
2012-13 Omaha Lancers USHL 28 3 7 10 0.357 0.2274 0.2053 1.0701 0.9660
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Union D1 ECAC SR 23 3 0 3 0.130
2015-16 Union D1 ECAC JR 36 8 1 9 0.250
2014-15 Union D1 ECAC SO 39 4 7 11 0.282
2013-14 Union D1 ECAC FR 31 9 12 21 0.677
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2013-14 · Union
+239.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12348
Forward overall
#536
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Murfitt
Manhattanville · 2003-04
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Gibson
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Malcolm Arseneau
Fredonia · 2018-19
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.