IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Woody Hudson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-08-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Indiana Ice USHL 56 11 7 18 0.321 0.1896 0.1829 0.9653 0.9309
2012-13 — USHL 65 16 12 28 0.431 0.2541 0.2315 1.2939 1.1790
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SR 33 2 3 5 0.151
2015-16 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 34 2 5 7 0.206
2014-15 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SO 36 6 6 12 0.333
2013-14 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC FR 37 6 5 11 0.297
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2013-14 · St. Lawrence
+63.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23079
Forward overall
#846
Forward born in 1992
#2254
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dakota Dubetz
Marian · 2008-09
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Braydon Beahm
St. Norbert · 2024-25
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Hatton
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.