← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Hatton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-07-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 45 50 26 76 1.689 0.2120 0.2091 0.5332 0.5259
2017-18 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 41 34 47 81 1.976 0.2479 0.2319
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 22 2 4 6 0.273
2020-21 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 MIAC JR 11 1 3 4 0.364
2020-21 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 11 1 3 4 0.364
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 MIAC SO 25 3 3 6 0.240
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 25 3 3 6 0.240
2018-19 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 MIAC FR 25 7 8 15 0.600
2018-19 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 25 7 8 15 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2018-19 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+214.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8083
Forward overall
#370
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

King's · 2022-23
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2007-08
0.737 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2014-15
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.