icepath.io · Hockey Analytics

← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Hatton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-07-12 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2016-17	St. Louis Jr. Blues	NA3HL	45	50	26	76	1.689	0.2035	0.2007	0.5335	0.5262
2017-18	St. Louis Jr. Blues	NA3HL	41	34	47	81	1.976	0.2381	0.2228	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2021-22	Saint Mary's	D3	MIAC	SR	22	2	4	6	0.273
2020-21	Saint Mary's	D3	—	JR	11	1	3	4	0.364
2019-20	Saint Mary's	D3	—	SO	25	3	3	6	0.240
2018-19	Saint Mary's	D3	—	FR	25	7	8	15	0.600

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.18

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.60

2018-19 · Saint Mary's

+227.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17362

Forward overall

#714

Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Zach Saar

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG

→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)

0.20 Developing

NCAAe PPG

Matt Pohlkamp

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG

→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)

0.20 Average

NCAAe PPG

Robin Höglund

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG

→ Minnesota

0.19 No data

NCAAe PPG

Alfred Larsson

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG

→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)

0.24 Developing

NCAAe PPG

Tyler Spezia

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG

→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)

0.16 Developing

NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jarrod Fitzpatrick

Utica · 2014-15

0.750 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Bobby Hineman

Adrian · 2005-06

0.714 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Donovan Hall

Neumann · 2003-04

0.684 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.