← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Soucy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Pueblo Bulls USPHL-Premier 45 9 20 29 0.644 0.0843 0.0876 0.2187 0.2273
2022-23 Pueblo Bulls USPHL-Premier 46 27 28 55 1.196 0.1564 0.1549 0.4058 0.4018
2023-24 Pueblo Bulls NCDC 50 13 28 41 0.820 0.3343 0.3170 0.6591 0.6250
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 King's D3 MAC SO 25 12 10 22 0.880
2024-25 King's D3 MAC 25 7 4 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2024-25 · King's
+103.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9192
Forward overall
#390
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2003-04
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Post · 2017-18
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2015-16
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.