IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Stirzinger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 48 5 6 11 0.229 0.0842 0.0883 0.2419 0.2536
2014-15 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 43 11 11 22 0.512 0.1880 0.1872 0.5400 0.5378
2015-16 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 58 17 22 39 0.672 0.2470 0.2350 0.7097 0.6753
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Aurora D3 NCHA SR 26 8 7 15 0.577
2018-19 Aurora D3 NCHA JR 26 4 4 8 0.308
2017-18 Aurora D3 NCHA SO 25 5 9 14 0.560
2016-17 Aurora D3 NCHA FR 14 5 8 13 0.929
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.93
2016-17 · Aurora
+402.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26932
Forward overall
#1043
Forward born in 1995
#2260
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan Hull
Marian · 2006-07
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady Harroun
Norwich · 2022-23
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Keenan Lund
Augsburg · 2018-19
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.