IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Hull Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-07-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Calgary Canucks AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2004-05 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 48 8 14 22 0.458 0.1531 0.1575 0.4254 0.4375
2005-06 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 42 12 22 34 0.809 0.2262 0.2179 0.5586 0.5381
2006-07 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 29 12 11 23 0.793 0.2216 0.2024 0.5473 0.4998
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Marian D3 NCHA SR 27 22 21 43 1.593
2009-10 Marian D3 — JR 26 21 16 37 1.423
2008-09 Marian D3 — SO 18 4 4 8 0.444
2007-08 Marian D3 — FR 27 12 11 23 0.852
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.85
2007-08 · Marian
+377.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19256
Forward overall
#768
Forward born in 1986

D1 Comparables

Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Drew Gannon
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Ruley
Northland · 2017-18
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Timpano
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.