IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drew Gannon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-07-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 — NAHL 10 1 2 3 0.300 0.1114 0.1108 0.3176 0.3160
2014-15 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 44 22 31 53 1.204 0.2585 0.2464 0.5898 0.5621
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast SR 14 1 0 1 0.071
2017-18 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast JR 10 0 2 2 0.200
2016-17 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast SO 24 4 3 7 0.292
2015-16 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast FR 29 5 7 12 0.414
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2015-16 · UMass Boston
+151.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18180
Forward overall
#739
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brent Cooper
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cody Ayers
Castleton · 2007-08
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Morris
Elmira · 2001-02
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.